SAN FRANCISCO — Jim Wilson/The New York Times
At the Oakland Farmers' Market, Karen Bischoff signed a petition by Tax and Regulate Cannabis seeking a ballot measure.
State lawmakers are holding a hearing on Wednesday on the effects of a bill that would legalize, tax and regulate the drug — in what would be the first such law in the United States. Tax officials estimate the legislation could bring the struggling state about $1.4 billion a year, and though the bill’s fate in the Legislature is uncertain, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, a Republican, has indicated he would be open to a “robust debate” on the issue.
California voters are also taking up legalization. Three separate initiatives are being circulated for signatures to appear on the ballot next year, all of which would permit adults to possess marijuana for personal use and allow local governments to tax it. Even opponents of legalization suggest that an initiative is likely to qualify for a statewide vote. “All of us in the movement have had the feeling that we’ve been running into the wind for years,” said James P. Gray, a retired judge in Orange County who has been outspoken in support of legalization. “Now we sense we are running with the wind.”
Proponents of the leading ballot initiative have collected nearly 300,000 signatures since late September, supporters say, easily on pace to qualify for the November 2010 general election. Richard Lee, a longtime marijuana activist who is behind the measure, says he has raised nearly $1 million to hire professionals to assist volunteers in gathering the signatures. “For a lot of people,” he said, “it’s just another brand of beer.”
That said, the bids to legalize marijuana are opposed by law enforcement groups across the state and, if successful, would undoubtedly set up a legal showdown with the federal government, which classifies marijuana as an illegal drug. Opponents said they are also preparing for a battle next year. Any vote would take place in a state where attitudes toward marijuana border on the schizophrenic. Last year, the state made some 78,500 arrests on felony and misdemeanors related to the drug, up from about 74,000 in 2007, according to the California attorney general.
At the same time, however, there are also pockets of California where marijuana can seem practically legal already. At least seven California cities have formally declared marijuana a low priority for law enforcement, with ballot measures or legislative actions. In Los Angeles, some 800 to 1,000 dispensaries of medical marijuana are in business, officials say, complete with consultants offering public relations services and “canna-business management.”
In Oakland, which passed a tax on medical cannabis sales in July, several people who signed a petition backing Mr. Lee’s initiative said they were motivated in part by the cost of imprisoning drug offenders and the toll of drug-related violence in Mexico. “Personally I don’t see a way of getting it under control other than legalizing it and taxing it,” said Jim Quinn, 60, a production manager. “We’ve got to get it out of the hands of criminals both domestic and international.”
Mr. Lovell, the law enforcement lobbyist, however, said those arguments paled in comparison to the potential pitfalls of legalization, including people driving under the influence. He also questioned how much net revenue a tax like Mr. Ammiano is proposing would actually raise. “We get revenue from alcohol,” he said. “But there’s way more in social costs than we retain in revenues.”
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I don't think legalizing it should be a huge deal. Keeping it illegal would almost be like make drinking alcohol and smoking illegal. Also, I personally believe that if it were legalized a lot of people would stop doing it. A big part of their doing pot is to be rebellious and breaking the law.
ReplyDeleteAnother thing, marijuana isn't as bad for you as smoking cigarettes. And if it isn't tampered with by chemicals then it isn't even addictive.
Though either way it doesn't matter. Whether or not it's legalized people will still do it, but I think people are trying to legalize it just to say that they made a movement.
-Hailey
For once, I agree with Hailey. Legal or otherwise, people will still use it. However, since legalizing it would increase it's availability, I have a hard time seeing how it would decrease the overall use. Sure, some people do it just to rebel against the law, but do you think it would be easy for them to suddenly stop just because it's legal? The fact is that people get hooked, making any such sudden quitting extremely difficult. Yes, there are ways to make it non-addictive, but do all people know of them? All in all, though, I don't think it would make a huge difference.
ReplyDeletei agree with hailey...if it were legalized then people would have no feeling of being sneeky or worrying about getting caught. and streets would fill with addicts, not that it isnt now, but i think crimes would also decrease some.
ReplyDelete