NEW YORK TIMES
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration will begin a drive this week to expel Pepsi, French fries and Snickers bars from the nation’s schools in hopes of reducing the number of children who get fat during their school years.
To that end, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack will deliver a speech Monday at the National Press Club in which he will insist, according to excerpts provided to The Times, that any vending machines that remain in schools be “filled with nutritious offerings to make the healthy choice the easy choice for our nation’s children.”
The first lady, Michelle Obama, said last month that she would lead an initiative to reduce childhood obesity, and her involvement “shows the importance all of us place on this issue,” Mr. Vilsack said.
The administration’s willingness to put Mrs. Obama’s popularity on the line is a calculated bet that concerns about childhood obesity have become so universal that the once-partisan fight over who should control school food offerings — the federal government or school boards — has subsided. But Republican support is far from certain.
Senator Saxby Chambliss, a Georgia Republican and the ranking member on the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, met at the White House with Mrs. Obama on Tuesday to talk about childhood obesity. And while Mr. Chambliss released a statement saying that “schools play an important role in shaping nutrition habits of young children,” an aide refused to say whether he would support a ban on junk foods. Other Republicans said they would wait to see legislation before signaling whether they would put aside long-held views that school boards should control food offerings.
While Democrats have coalesced around the idea of denying sweets to schoolchildren, many students are not keen. When Asthtyn Bowling, a 16-year-old junior at Orange County High School in Orange, Va., was told of the looming ban, she was shocked. “That would be terrible!” she said.
The legislation would reauthorize the government’s school breakfast and lunch programs. It aims to transform the eating habits of many of the nation’s children and teenagers, but some school officials say it will further crimp already strained budgets. In addition to banning sugary treats, the new rules would require many schools to offer more nutritious options, which could be expensive. The administration has proposed spending $1 billion more each year on the $18 billion meals program, but the increase may not be enough to cover the extra costs.
The National School Lunch Program serves 31 million children in more than 100,000 schools. It was started in 1946 to ensure that children get enough to eat after health problems related to malnutrition were found in an alarming number of World War II draftees. Now, health officials are also worried that children are eating too much of the wrong foods. About two-thirds of the nation’s adults and a third of its children are overweight — double the rates of 1980.
Industry opposition to the new legislation has softened in part because the Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo now sell far more than Coke and Pepsi. So instead of having to yank vending machines from schools, the companies could replace offerings with bottled water or juice.
Orange County High School has vending machines with Pepsi, Mountain Dew and Dr Pepper, but even more popular among students is a candy cart wheeled into the school’s central hallway three times a day by Betty Almond, a school secretary.
The cart is laden with Pop-Tarts, Skittles and Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups, and Mrs. Almond and helpers barely keep up with demand from students on their way to class. Sales are between $400 and $500 a week, which Mrs. Almond uses to buy uniforms and equipment for school sports teams. Her most recent project was to outfit the wrestling team, on which her grandson competes. “The football team wants me to buy them a seven-man sled, but with this new legislation, they’ll never get it,” she said sadly. Principal Gene Kotulka said he planned to write his congressman to complain about a ban.
I think they should care about children's future, if they overweight, they will get some diseases, it's bad for their body. They can not just care about money are not enough, if their kids have a bad body, sick every day, how can they work or study.
ReplyDeleteI agree and disagree with Kevin-peng here. For one, he is right about how the junk food is bad for you, but i think it should be the child's choice about getting the food, its their own body and they should take care of it however they want. I would also personally like new equipment for sports. It funds that pretty well.
ReplyDeleteI say that the food is bad for you, but the kids should have there own choice. I believe it is up to the kids if they want to have junk food or not. It should be the kids choice on how to take care of their body not the schools.
ReplyDeleteI say that the kids should have there own choice but not in school, because if the eat junk food at home they will proably do it at school, they should at least recieve one healthy meal in a day . Because the junk food can lead to heart and other serious problems.
ReplyDeleteeven though they made a profit and it went towards the school it still dosent help the kids who are overweight.
The junk food can cause obesity with lead to blood vessel and cardinal problems.Obesity is also bad for teens' growth.Although the policy may lead school to some financial problems, it will help a lot to students' health, more nutritious meal,more balanced diet is saying needless important for one's growth.
ReplyDeleteI think that junk food is bad for people but it should still be their choice on whether or not to eat it. I dont think schools should take out junk food. One reason is that they would lose money. Ask any kid if he would rather have a chocolate bar or a granola bar and they are going to say the chocolate bar. if you take out the junk food nobody will buy the healthy food. Yes, there will be a few health nuts that will buy it but the majority of the students will dislike the change. Another reason is that i still think it is the childs choice on whether to eat it or not. Smoking is bad but we still give people a choice on whether or not to do it. Both cancer and being overweight are bad things but it comes down to that the person had a choice on whether to smoke or to eat junk food. Let the children decide what they want to eat and dont force healthy food down their throtes.
ReplyDeleteI see what Joel is saying, but I don't completely agree. Encouraging kids to eat healthy and take care of their bodies is very important. On the other hand, I don't think we should completely ban anything unhealthy. My answer would be to serve healthy lunches including: a vegetable, healthy carb., healthy fat, and protein. Then, simply set a limit on how much a kid can spend on junk. In schools, such as ours, we have concessions. What about setting a limit as to how much one person can buy? We can also cut back on some of the worst things, but not completely rid the school of them. For example: baked chips over regular. Small, simple things such as this can really make a difference.
ReplyDeleteWell, isn't that nice. Nothing says "You're government cares" like a little encroachment on the pursuit of happiness. If it makes people happy to have junk food and pop machines in school, then it should be a right, or at least a choice. I may sound silly, but as far as I know, there was never any article of the constitution stating "nor either shall our educated youth be subject to French fries and coca cola." Of course, there was nothing saying the government can't control it either, but it's reasons like this that there are TWO lunch lines, right? I'm David Olson, and that's my rant for today.
ReplyDeleteI agree with David it should be our choice what we eat and not everyone else's. If the kid wants to eat some French fries and Snickers and all that junk food it should be their choice. But I also think the kids eating all that stuff should eat responsibly also.
ReplyDeleteNick C pr.7
ReplyDeleteI think that if a kid wants to eat junk food they should be able to. It should be your own decision on whether or not you want to eat junk food or not. I think that the schools can cut back just a litle bit on the junk food and they can serve a healthier lunch. A kid normaly knows what food is good for you and what ones aren't. A lot of schools have diet pop instead of regular and people say that diet pop is worst for you than regular, so why allow that kind of pop. I think a kid should watch what they eat a litle bit and eat some healthy stuff, but just let kids decide what they want to eat.
I think that taking away junk food from schools is a bad idea. Just because some people get fat off it doesn't mean that they should take it away. If people are starting to get big off the junk food and they really care about it, they should just stop eating it. It's their own problem if they get fat, not the schools. I know that it causes some health problems, but I'm sure that if people want junk food they are going to eat it out of school so why stop them from eating it during school? A lot of people are bringing up the healthier lunches, and I agree with that. We should get a few more options for lunch, and maybe we should actually get lunches that taste good. Some people end up buying the junk food from the concessions because they don't like the school lunch, but they need something to eat. If we actually had a good lunch maybe people would get full off that and not need to buy the extra candy.
ReplyDeletei agree with tanner. It should be the kids choice whether or not we have junk food or not. Honestly we can and should be able to take responsibilties for our actions. Also school lunches should be better than they are. Poor lunches are leading to kids just leaving the schools without singing out or having permission and getting lunches that arent good for us anyways.
ReplyDeleteI think that kids should choose what they eat. If you want to eat junk food its your decition. Most kids know that junk food can harm your body, and if they want to eat it knowing that well than let them. But i do think that we should get homemade meal every day at school, like fresh healthy real food. Well if you like junk food then keep on eating it.
ReplyDeleteI for one, definitely agree with everyone here. It should be anyones choice. Not everyone is the same. Theres certain people that actually need the junk food for certain health conditions....something like that. Yeah so what it costs alot more for the school to buy all of the junk food. But you gotta think, if there was healthy stuff in the vendors not many people would buy it because its's nasty so...therefore the school wouldn't get much money from it. If....there was junk food a lot more people would buy. And i'm saying that all schools should just keep the junk food if they really need the money.I'm sure most people have control of their munchies. So obesity shouldn't be to much of a hassle for them.
ReplyDeleteI'm surprised that anybody would suggest taking away junk food from schools. Like Allison said, it's a great way to make money, and most schools are in the hurt tank right now when it comes to money. Also, junk food's really not the lone cause of obesity anyway. If you eat lots of junk food and exercise a lot you can still maintain a healthy body. It's really just the person's lifestyle choices that determine whether or not they become obese. So overall, I don't think there's any reason to get rid of junk food.
ReplyDeleteI agree with everybody here. If people want to eat junk food then that's their choice, and if they end up getting fat from it it's their own problem. There are a lot of people that don't even get fat from junk food, and the ones that do know not to eat as much of it. If the ones eating it really care about if they're fat or not they would probably stop eating as much of it or just work out and try to burn it off.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Tanner on how we should get better lunches so people actually get full when they're having a school lunch. When they're serving really nasty food most people wouldn't want to eat it and would rather go buy something at the concessions. Personally I would way rather eat a snickers for lunch that most of the food that we get at our school.
I agree and disagree here. Taking away junk food may be a good thing in the schools, but nobody is going to eat "broccoli" out of the vending machines! Yes, the junk food gets it's money worth but weight is becoming a serious problem with students. Junk food shouldn't totally be taken out of the schools though. There's many people that get that craving every now and then. I mean, there's pop, candy, chips and all that in the teacher's lounge. If they can eat it, so can we.
ReplyDeleteNo, I don't agree with this ban. It is an easy way for the school to make money. The teachers are not strict enough on kids who leave school so they can just run to Holiday anyway. We live in a free country and are free to choose what we eat. If the school decides it doesn't want junk food then that is their choice but the government shouldn't be choosing for us.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the government's idea that trying to keep students healty, but I think the way they are doing is not proper. Even if junk food is JUNK, there is students' right to choose what they want. So if the government really cared for children, they should have set a better choices than junk food so that students could choose better food than junk food, not wiping out junk food.
ReplyDeleteOkay, I agree with most that the government shouldn't really control what we eat even if it's in school. The government probably knows obesity isn't the schools fault but they probably thought banning junk food in schools would be a small step towards helping the obesity rate steady. It's usually the individual/parent or associate's fault. Yes, junk food isn't good for you, but I think we have the right to the luxury of eating whatever we want.
ReplyDeleteI think it's a good thing that they're going to ban the junk food because more and more children are dealing with obesity. This might give kids less urge to eat candy or junk food everyday if you take it out of the schools. It will more than likely help the kid's health also because being fit is a lot healthier than being fat.
ReplyDeleteIf they decide not to take these things out of schools and kids become overweight its their fault. They should be responsible for choosing what they eat and they should know the consequences.
I agree and disagree with all of this! I agree on the part when they say that kids should be eating heathly! Everyone should even tho most people dont. But i disagree with taking the junk foods out of the school because not every one belives in eating healthy all the time! And taking the machines away isnt going to do anything because they will bring junk food to school or some may leave school to get junk food. Some people have sports and other activities after school and they forget to bring something to eat after school so they pop in a few quarters and get a little snack. No big deal.
ReplyDeleteThis subject has always interested me. If I had to decide, I really don't know what I'd do, because, to be honest, I think kids are overweight because of the way their lifestyles are at -home-. I don't think having a pop or a candy bar at school is always that harmful. I WOULD like to see healthier snacks offered, though. And there's a reason they say not to have dessert before supper- it really does ruin your appetite. I know whenever I do that I stop wanting regular food and just want more sugar. It's powerful stuff that way. So if they're having candy during and right after school, what are they gonna want [more of] when they get home?
ReplyDeleteI think it is pointless to try to keep junk food out of schools because either way as soon as half the kids get home they are going to eat junk food anyways. for some people thats all they eat is junk food. I see what they are trying to do and actually try something to see if it will help but either way i dont think it will make a difference.
ReplyDeleteThe kids that want to eat junk food are going to eat it anyways. Im sure kids will just start bring pop and candy to school just so they can eat junk food. For some some kids its part of their daily diet.
ReplyDeleteIt's pointless to push it out of the schools they can just eat at home. All this would do is take some profit away from the schools. I my opinion it's extremely stupid to do. If a kid wants junk food they will find it.
ReplyDeletei think that the schools shouldnt have to be going through this because shouldnt the parents and the kids care about their health?. i think that if they dont care enough then it is their problem. because taking it all out isnt really a good idea. there are kids that are healthy that would like to have a snack every now and then. it isnt fair to them. but i can see where taking all of the junk food out of the school would help the problem with obesity. but it isnt a good idea.
ReplyDelete-Danielle H2
I think that would be good, but never junk food in school would be horrible, because the food in school is always disgusting and if there were no junk food anymore i think nobody would it in school and would drive to the next fast food resturante.
ReplyDeleteJanina Rumpf
LAST COMMENT
ReplyDelete