Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Education cuts are nationwide

NEW YORK TIMES
By TAMAR LEWIN and SAM DILLON
School districts around the country, forced to resort to drastic money-saving measures, are warning hundreds of thousands of teachers that their jobs may be eliminated in June. The districts have no choice, they say, because their usual sources of revenue — state money and local property taxes — have been hit hard by the recession. In addition, federal stimulus money earmarked for education has been mostly used up this year.

As a result, the 2010-11 school term is shaping up as one of the most austere in the last half century. In addition to teacher layoffs, districts are planning to close schools, cut programs, enlarge classes and shorten the school day, week or year to save money.

“We are doing things and considering options I never thought I’d have to consider,” said Peter C. Gorman, superintendent of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg schools in North Carolina, who expects to cut 600 of the district’s 9,400 teachers this year, after laying off 120 last year. “This may be our new economic reality.”

Secretary of Education Arne Duncan estimated that state budget cuts imperiled 100,000 to 300,000 public school jobs. In an interview on Monday, he said the nation was flirting with “education catastrophe,” and urged Congress to approve additional stimulus funds to save school jobs. “We absolutely see this as an emergency,” Mr. Duncan said.

Some of the deepest cuts are in Los Angeles, where Superintendent Ramon C. Cortines sent notices to 5,200 of the district’s 80,000 employees last month, telling them that they were losing their jobs. “I’ve been superintendent in five major school districts, and had responsibility for cuts for years — but not this magnitude, not this devastating,” Mr. Cortines said.

And there is no end in sight, he said. He cut his district’s $12 billion budget this school year by $1 billion, has prepared $600 million in cuts for the term beginning in the fall and is looking ahead to a deficit for the following year of $263 million. “I don’t see this being over in the year 2014-15,” Mr. Cortines added.

In the economic stimulus bill passed in February 2009, Congress appropriated about $100 billion in emergency education financing. States spent much of that in the current fiscal year, saving more than 342,000 school jobs, about 5.5 percent of all the positions in the nation’s 15,000 school systems, according to a study by the Center on Reinventing Public Education at the University of Washington.

Warning of an educational emergency, Senator Tom Harkin, Democrat of Iowa, proposed a $23 billion school bailout bill last Wednesday that would essentially provide more education stimulus financing to stave off the looming wave of school layoffs. “This is not something we can fix in August,” said Mr. Harkin, chairman of the Senate education committee. “We have to fix it now.”

Senior Democratic aides said that because Mr. Harkin’s bill would add to the deficit, it was unlikely to pass.

A survey by the American Association of School Administrators found that 9 of 10 superintendents expected to lay off school workers for the fall, up from two of three superintendents last year. The survey also found that the percentage considering a four-day school week had jumped to 13 percent, from 2 percent a year ago.

The current round of cuts is particularly wrenching, superintendents said, because their financing was already cut to the bone last year. For example, Barbara Thompson, superintendent of the Montgomery public schools in Alabama, said the state used to give her district $975 per student for supplies, technology and library costs. “They cut it to zero,” Ms. Thompson said. “So they can’t cut it any more.”

In early April, the Flagstaff, Ariz., school district’s preliminary list of people who might not have jobs next year included almost a third of its 1,500 employees — every art, music and physical education teacher, every counselor and librarian, every teacher with three or fewer years in the district, and all temporary hires.

In the U-46 district in Elgin, Ill., José M. Torres, the superintendent, said he also had to contend with a budgeting roller coaster this spring. At this point, the only uncertainty is whether the district’s 53 schools in Chicago’s western suburbs will feel “high pain or low pain,” Mr. Torres said.

Seeking to cut at least $44 million from the district’s $400 million budget, Mr. Torres has eliminated early childhood classes for 100 children, cut middle school football, increased high school class sizes from 24 to 30 students, drained swimming pools to save chlorine, and dismissed 1,000 employees, including 700 teachers.

“This stuff really hurts,” Mr. Torres said. And what is worse, he said, “I think next year will be tougher than this year.”

3 comments:

  1. This is pretty obvious. Our economy is in a nationwide decline, so why would we be the only ones cutting back on expenses? It's a recession. You have to look at spending in a completely different way. As hard as this may be on teachers and other staff, it looks like the only way to get through this recession without the schools going bankrupt. I may not agree with some decisions being made in Warroad, but drastic situations call for drastic response.

    ReplyDelete
  2. David has some good points. Cuts are a necessary evil in all jobs since we're in a recession, but especially in areas that are funded by the government. Tough times call for drastic measures, and in this case that means that a lot of teachers and other people will be at risk of losing their jobs. I personally think that we should raise the taxes, because that could potentially put more money towards school funding, which would save some jobs and also keep our schools in good shape.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think they are making some good and some bad cuts. They should just cut the classes that not many students take and isnt going that great in the attendence area and keep the classes that are completly full of people and cant hardley fit all the students in that want to be in that way those students would get in those classes because they would have cut the point less ones. And I also feel that if we are soooo tight on money and cant afford to have all the classes and teachers as we want or should then they need to stop spending money on the stupid stuff that we mabye dont need as much or even cut a sport or 2 or try to cut down on money use on other things and focus on our teachers and classes that some people are missing out on!
    Heather Tyler

    ReplyDelete