PLEASANTVILLE, Tenn. — After services at the Church at Cane Creek on a recent Sunday, a few dozen families held a potluck picnic and giggling children played pin the tail on the donkey. The white-bearded preacher, Michael Pearl, who delivered his sermon in stained work pants, and his wife, Debi, mixed warmly with the families drawn to their evangelical ministry, including some of their own grandchildren.
The pastoral mood in the hills of Tennessee offered a stark contrast to the storm raging around the country over the Pearls’ teachings on child discipline, which advocate systematic use of “the rod” to teach toddlers to submit to authority. The methods, seen as common sense by some grateful parents and as horrific by others, are modeled, Mr. Pearl is fond of saying, on “the same principles the Amish use to train their stubborn mules.”
Debate over the Pearls’ teachings, first seen on Christian Web sites, gained new intensity after the death of a third child, all allegedly at the hands of parents who kept the Pearls’ book, “To Train Up a Child,” in their homes. On Sept. 29, the parents were charged with homicide by abuse.
More than 670,000 copies of the Pearls’ self-published book are in circulation, and it is especially popular among Christian home-schoolers, who praise it in their magazines and on their Web sites. The Pearls provide instructions on using a switch from as early as six months to discourage misbehavior and describe how to make use of implements for hitting on the arms, legs or back, including a quarter-inch flexible plumbing line that, Mr. Pearl notes, “can be rolled up and carried in your pocket.”
The furor in part reflects societal disagreements over corporal punishment, which conservative Christians say is called for in the Bible and which many Americans consider reasonable up to a point, even as many parents and pediatricians reject it. The issue flared recently when a video was posted online of a Texas judge whipping his daughter.
Mr. Pearl, 66, and Mrs. Pearl, 60, say that blaming their book for extreme abuse by a few unstable parents is preposterous and that they explicitly counsel against acting in anger or causing a bruise. They say that their methods, properly used, yield peace and happy teenagers.
In the latest case, Larry and Carri Williams of Sedro-Woolley, Wash., were home-schooling their six children when they adopted a girl and a boy, ages 11 and 7, from Ethiopia in 2008. The two were seen by their new parents as rebellious, according to friends.
Late one night in May this year, the adopted girl, Hana, was found face down, naked and emaciated in the backyard; her death was caused by hypothermia and malnutrition, officials determined. According to the sheriff’s report, the parents had deprived her of food for days at a time and had made her sleep in a cold barn or a closet and shower outside with a hose. And they often whipped her, leaving marks on her legs. The mother had praised the Pearls’ book and given a copy to a friend, the sheriff’s report said. Hana had been beaten the day of her death, the report said, with the 15-inch plastic tube recommended by Mr. Pearl.
Some of the Williamses’ other tactics also seemed to involve Pearl advice taken to extremes; the Pearls say that “a little fasting is good training,” for example, and suggest hosing off a child who has potty-training lapses. The Williamses have pleaded not guilty and are awaiting trial.
The Skagit County prosecutor said that he was not charging the Pearls and that the case for homicide did not depend on the Williamses’ readings or religion.
But Dr. Frances Chalmers, a pediatrician who examined Hana’s death for the Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, said of the Pearl methods: “My fear is that this book, while perhaps well intended, could easily be misinterpreted and could lead to what I consider significant abuse.”
Some conservative Christian parents reject the Pearls’ teachings and have started a petition drive asking sellers like Amazon not to stock their books. Crystal Lutton, who runs Grace-Based Discipline, one of several Christian blogs that oppose corporal punishment, said the danger with the Pearls’ methods is that “if you don’t get results, the only thing to do is to punish harder and harder.”
Parents at Mr. Pearl’s church said they largely followed the couple’s approach and were puzzled by the controversy. The Pearls’ children, too, say the attacks on their parents are misguided. “I had a wonderful childhood,” said their daughter Shoshanna Easling, 28, who is training her two children the same way. “My parents never spoke to me in anger, and I can only remember being spanked a couple of times.”
Mr. Pearl said that Shoshanna was spanked probably 50 times as a toddler but that it soon became unnecessary.
Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I think that it is ok for a parent to spank their child so they learn discipline or if they have a good reason to punish their children. If there is no discipline the kids would not learn right from wrong. I don't think it is ok to injure the children.
ReplyDeleteTim M 7
I don't think its right that children get spanked because the parents could hurt them or get to carried away and they could die. I think they should ground them and if they are to little put them in the corner. I think its wrong that Pearl wrote the book.
ReplyDeleteMacKenzie N. 1
I think that type of punishment should be against the law.I don't think parents realize how much harm they cause to their child by physical abuse.They should come up with a better way to get through to their children,like maybe talking to them about it,or maybe even using the 'grounding' technique.
ReplyDeleteChristopher W. 1
I think that the parents should of known that hitting a child is wrong. There are other ways to control children but hitting shouldn't be one of them. A child learns from their parents so when they get older they might think that hitting is okay.
ReplyDeleteJimmy P.7
Hitting your child to cause pain, is wrong, but I do think that spanking, a little swat not to harm the child but to teach them that what they are doing is bad or wrong, or whatever. Just to teach them a lesson otherwise they are never going to learn. Cause some parents don't dicipline there children at all, and then all they do is throw a temper and scream, cry, misbehave, and you have to teach them that its not okay to do that. So a little swat doesn't seem so bad to me...but hitting to cause pain is definitely not okay.
ReplyDeleteSavannah T7
I think don't think it as a good idea to just think that spanking is wrong. Sometimes, if it is not so harsh, I think parents need to spank their children when it is needed. But, everyone should make sure that there's difference between spanking and abusing. Spanking is needed, but not abusing their child and make them to hurt or die.
ReplyDeleteSeoHyun P.1
I believe that it's okay for a parent to spank their child. The child needs to learn their lesson, and to get some form of punishment, in my opinion. The one thing I don't agree with, is if your disciplining a child to the point of injuring them. In my opinion, if your doing that your only making things worse. Not just for the child, but for you too. If you injure the child, then they're hurt, and you will be charged with abuse. Nobody, in my opinion, wins in that situation
ReplyDeleteBarrett B.3
I think that it is okay for a parent to spank there child as long as they don't get carried away with it. The child needs to learn their lesson but so they know that it is not okay. But hitting a child untill you injure them it definitely not acceptable.
ReplyDeleteAlyssa C.3
Parents have always been able to give physical punishments wether it be back in the 1900's or now, I don't think it should make a difference. There is a line that parents should not cross when spanking their kids, it's a punishment, not a beating. Most parents, however, know there is a strict difference. If no one ever physically punished their kids, things would get really out of hand. Kids need to know when parents are serous about something, and spanking is a for sure sign that you did something wrong. If, however, a parent were to slap or hit their child due to misbehaving, I would not find it acceptable. Hitting or slaping a child is different, and hurt a lot more than getting hit in the butt a few times.
ReplyDeleteI don't think it helps to spank your child I just watched an episode of Dr. Phil on this whole spanking issue. I think spanking say a two year old will not teach them anything, it will make them afraid of you, & make you look like your trying intimidate them. Hitting and spanking are also a huge difference. Hitting your child can hurt them. If your going to spank your child one hit on the butt will do it, it doesn't need to go any further than that. People who can hit their children without feeling horrible about them selves are just pathetic.
ReplyDeleteCheyenne Hjelle P.7
The other day I was watching an Interview in the Tv with this preacher and I was shocked by everything he said about this book and all the things you're supposed to do to your kids... I think this is the most stupid way to race your children because you can make them learn without hurting them, this is a child abuse because they can't defend their selves and i just don't now how can a mother or father can treat their kids like that, and the thing that is more stupid is that people believe this just because he said they mention this in the Bible.. if people really knew that in the Bible the only thing that they mention is Love and compassion, and they never mention that hurting is the right thing so people just need to stop doing that now and stop publishing that book too.
ReplyDeleteLucy M7
I think Lucy is right, I mean who one says that one book has to include the whole truth about everything? That's just stupid. You have your own brain to think what is right or wrong and just because of your believes that you are doing what is written in a book you can't hurt someone just because the book said it, how weird is this?
ReplyDeleteBelinda B.7
This is ridiculous! I totally disagree! Okay, yes I understand that sometimes children do need to be spanked, but as early as 6 months? Are you kidding me? Would the baby look at you wrong or something? I just dont understand. I think that there is an appropriate time to start physically discplining children. At the earliest maybe around or a little before 1 just a slight slap/spanking as Savannah mentioned so they are aware they are doing wrong.
ReplyDeleteKatelyn V3