Monday, September 24, 2012

Middle Schools Add a Team Rule: Get a Drug Test

NEW YORK TIMESBy MARY PILON
MILFORD, Pa. — As a 12-year-old seventh grader, Glenn and Kathy Kiederer’s older daughter wanted to play sports at Delaware Valley Middle School here. She also wanted to join the scrapbooking club. One day she took home a permission slip. It said that to participate in the club or any school sport, she would have to consent to drug testing. “They were asking a 12-year-old to pee in a cup,” Kathy Kiederer said. “I have a problem with that. They’re violating her right to privacy over scrapbooking? Sports?”

Olympic athletes must submit urine samples to prove they are not doping. The same is true for Tour de France cyclists, N.F.L. players, college athletes and even some high school athletes. Now, children in grades as low as middle school are being told that providing a urine sample is required to play sports or participate in extracurricular activities like drama and choir.

Such drug testing at the middle school level is confounding students and stirring objections from parents and proponents of civil liberties. The Kiederers, whose two daughters are now in high school, are plaintiffs in a lawsuit against the Delaware Valley School District, with the daughters identified only by their first initials, A. and M. The parents said that mandatory drug testing was unnecessary and that it infringed on their daughters’ rights.

It is difficult to gauge how many middle schools conduct drug tests on students. States with middle schools that conduct drug testing include Florida, Alabama, Missouri, West Virginia, Arkansas, Ohio, New Jersey and Texas. Some coaches, teachers and school administrators said drug-testing programs served as a deterrent for middle school students encountering drugs of all kinds, including steroids, marijuana and alcohol. “We wanted to do it to create a general awareness of drug prevention,” said Steve Klotz, assistant superintendent at Maryville School District in Missouri. “We’re no different than any other community. We have kids who are making those decisions.”

There are no known instances of a middle school student testing positive for performance-enhancing drugs like steroids or human growth hormone. The few positive results among middle school students have been attributed to marijuana, officials said, and even those cases are rare.

Maryville’s drug-testing program, which includes most of its middle and high school students, begins this fall after officials spent 18 months reviewing other programs in the state, Mr. Klotz said. In the fall of 2011, Mr. Klotz said, the school board conducted a survey of parents, and 72 percent said that a drug-testing program was necessary.

Drug testing for high school athletes, which has been around for years, was deemed constitutional in a 1995 United States Supreme Court ruling. Some districts have expanded their drug-testing programs in recent years to include middle school students.

But some experts doubt the effectiveness of such testing. “There’s little evidence these programs work,” Dr. Goldberg said. “Drug testing has never been shown to have a deterrent effect.” In 2007, Dr. Goldberg published the results of a study of athletes at five high schools with drug testing and six schools that had deferred implementing a testing policy. He found that athletes from the two groups did not differ in their recent use of drugs or alcohol.

“I think you have to look at the reason for testing,” Dr. Goldberg said. “With Olympic testing, it’s to weed out the people who are cheating. If you’re using drug testing to weed out a problem in kids, you need to get them in therapy. But it doesn’t reduce whether or not kids use drugs.”

Some coaches and school administrators, however, say the dearth of positive tests is an indication that testing is working effectively as a deterrent. “We don’t want to catch students,” said Jerry Cecil, assistant superintendent of the Greenwood School District in Arkansas. “We want them not to be using.”

22 comments:

  1. I don't really care about the drug test, but they should make those drug test to be used on kids 16 and older. Most kids under 16 don't do drugs... most.

    P. Kevin Bouphasavanh

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think it is a good thing that the kids get drug tested because some kids do drugs.The reason i feel that they should not use drugs is because it is bad for there health,and they are just getting stupid.If they use drugs to cheat in the Olympics they should not be playing then.

    AshleyOtto p2

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think that people should do the sports &the other activites that they want but they shouldn't have to take a drug test inless they are 16 & older.those people who are taking drugs are just being stupid when they do it.if they are just going to cheat by using the drugs they shouldn't be do the sports that they are in.it is just being stupid to use the drugs for trying to win something that him/her is good or bad at.if they do it they should get kicked off the team for doing it.

    chelsey jensen p7.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is a very good idea, and I believe that all schools should do this. Alcohol and drugs are a huge issue in school, and its like 65% of teens have tried them, or usually use alcohol/drugs. Abuse of drugs/alcohol effects learning so much, so why not test it in school? Sure its awkward like telling them you've done weed since you were two, or when your giving them your pee in a cup. Despite the disadvantages,it would be so beneficial for our country if we're smarter students by not doing drugs/alcohol.

    Jonas Fisher, Period 2.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I don't think it's necessary to test them for drugs unless they have reason to be suspicious. There are many teenagers throughout America that use drugs but these are only middle school children.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Illegal drug use is a large issue in schools around the world. Testing athletes will not only catch current users, but it would be seen as a deterrent for those thinking of using. The issue with this is whether or not the testing should be done on students. I see no reason why this would be an issue though. Testing athletes for drugs was deemed constitutional and I see no reason why it would not be for athletes that were younger. It's legal, so schools should be able to do it if they feel it is necessary.
    Dylan Olson, P.2

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think they shouldn't drug test children under 12 of age. They could think getting tested is scary. They should test older kids because they are more likely to do drugs.

    Jerlyn p7

    ReplyDelete
  8. I think 14 and older should be drug tested, by saying that. Thats when they start thinking I want be like my brother/sister so I got do what they do. So yes, I like the drug test in sports and high school probably start doing drug test each quarter. Why I say that? Cause high schools are the many reason these kids are getting drugs, or at a someone place that has brother/sister that's doing drugs and tell that child its candy or something like that and now that child likes it. Wants more. Then he notice when he gets older you can sell it on the street. Make money so you can buy more. So yes I like this in schools. And trust me, I know the dark side of drugs. And I have to live with it my hole life. And I'll never know that good part of that good side he once had in life.

    Ryan Tappe P7

    ReplyDelete
  9. I agree with Ryan. Why would you test a 10 year old when they don't even know what a cigarette is? I think it should be around the age 14 and up. Most moms might think their kids run off and smoke marijuana before games and I think that's true. Kids get bored of their sports so they make it fun by smoking marijuana or during school even.

    David Hoang P3

    ReplyDelete
  10. I'm going to have to agree with Cami. Unless there is reasonable suspicion that a student athlete is on drugs, it's unnecessary to require a drug test. I also consider it an invasion of a persons privacy (particularly a middle schooler) to, without reason, make them take a urine test in order to participate in school activities that they are paying for. Being 16, i would still feel uncomfortable having to do that so i cant imagine being forced to when i was 12 just because i wanted to play my favorite sports. There are better ways to keep teens from doing drugs then scaring them away from physical and mental activities. Sports and extracaricular activities are the things that keep teens out of drugs, alcohol, and trouble in general so if this rule stops more kids from joining sports it will have the opposite affect then initially wanted and more kids will end up involved in drugs

    ReplyDelete
  11. I think that kids should be drug tested starting at grade 9. I feel like 9th grade is where kids start looking up to maybe some seniors that may be doing drugs and the kids will think there not bad for you, when really they are a terrible thing. Also if you catch kids in 9th grade using drugs hopefully they havent done them very much and you can stop them before they get addicted and start to use it everyday and need it.


    kobe roth p3

    ReplyDelete
  12. Im with Cami also<but i dont thing that if you doing extra activity events like chior and band ect.you shouldn't have to be tested. Unless the student in the activities are suspected of doing illeagel activity.

    Luke Jaycox P2

    ReplyDelete
  13. Most things that go on record start happening in 9th grade. I feel that should be the same for drug tests if there going to do them. I honestly don't feel like they should though because as Cailee said its probably going to turn the kids away from sports and other activities if they feel uncomfortable because they have to take a drug test. I know i would feel weird.

    Molly B p7

    ReplyDelete
  14. I think kids should be tested for drugs if they are in any sports. It may detour kids from trying drugs in the first place. But i dont think kids should be tested for things like choir and scrapbooking. That seems a little pushy to me.

    Alex Burke P7

    ReplyDelete
  15. I think it is very unnecessary for schools to drugs test the kids unless they have had prior experiences with drugs and/or alcohol. If I were to be tested for drugs randomly I wouldn't feel comfortable participating on the team, because I would feel as though our school can't trust us. Although drug testing could be effective for kids that have had prior experiences, because it probably would make the team/club more comfortable knowing that they don't have negative peer pressure surrounding them. Overall, I think that drug testing in public schools randomly shouldn't be allowed without reason to believe that the person is using.

    ReplyDelete
  16. i think kids should be tested for drugs. because if they love their sport enough they wont even think about doing drugs. but to be drug tested for scrapbooking sounds ridiculous.

    Garrett Rasmusson P7

    ReplyDelete
  17. I think it is very unnecessary for schools to drugs test the kids unless they have had prior experiences with drugs and/or alcohol. If I were to be tested for drugs randomly I wouldn't feel comfortable participating on the team, because I would feel as though our school can't trust us. Although drug testing could be effective for kids that have had prior experiences, because it probably would make the team/club more comfortable knowing that they don't have negative peer pressure surrounding them. Overall, I think that drug testing in public schools randomly shouldn't be allowed without reason to believe that the person is using.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Just cause a kid doesn't have a history with drugs doesn't mean they don't do them. If they are going to do drug testing do it right and look into the kid's habits to pick out potential drug-users in 9th grade and up in sports. Don't in non-physical sports though, with scrapbooking it doesn't make a difference but with Choir you can tell cause drugs destroy your vocal cords.

    Alyssa Crowe
    3rd period

    ReplyDelete
  19. I think that testing kids for drugs in elementary school is unnecessary. Unless the student has been caught with drugs or using them, they shouldn't be tested. Drug testing should start in the seventh grade, not for little 7 year olds.It's a violation of the child's rights to test them without any reasonable belief that they have been involved in drugs.

    Madison Goulet
    3rd Period

    ReplyDelete
  20. **middle school
    Madison Goulet
    3rd period

    ReplyDelete
  21. I believe that starting in 7th grade, students that are going to be in sports should be drug tested. If kids find out that they will be drug tested for being in a a sport, I think the use of drugs would go down considerably. I dont agree with drug testing kids in band and choir, because most of them should know better. If a kid is on drugs and hears about the drug testing, i believe that he/she will stop using drugs if they care about their sport.

    Jared Streiff
    2nd period

    ReplyDelete