(CNN) by Nicolaus Mills
-- College basketball has a new record holder for most points in a game. Last week, Jack Taylor, a 5-foot, 10-inch guard at Iowa's Grinnell College, scored 138 points to lead Grinnell to a 179-104 blowout win over Faith Baptist Bible College, a nearby Iowa college. In setting his scoring record, Taylor made 52 of 108 shots from the field, including 27 of 71 three-point attempts and shot 7 for 10 from the foul line.
Taylor's coach and teammates were happy to see him go all out. In the 36 minutes he played, Taylor did not have a single assist. Virtually every time he got the ball, he shot it.
Taylor is not the first basketball player to go on such an outsized scoring spree. In the National Basketball Association, the scoring record belongs to the Philadelphia Warriors' Wilt Chamberlain. Fifty years ago, Chamberlain put up 100 points in a March 2, 1962, game against the New York Knicks, who were missing their starting center. Chamberlain, who at 7-foot-1 towered over his opponents, was never much of an outside shooter, but his "Dipper Dunk" was all he needed. He was unstoppable anywhere near the basket.
Taylor's scoring feat is different from that. Chamberlain was playing in a game in which his opponent was outclassed but still in his league. That was not the case in the Grinnell game.
Jack Taylor's scoring binge came against a college that doesn't come close to having his college's resources. What the basketball players at Faith Baptist Bible College must be feeling about losing by 75 points doesn't seem to have entered anyone's head at Grinnell or in the media, which couldn't get enough of Taylor in the days following his scoring feat.
I grew up in the Middle West playing basketball at a prep school that often competed against tiny rural high schools to get ready for our games in an interstate league. When it came to running up the score, there was a code our coaches enforced.
With a big lead, we slowed the game down. We stopped taking long shots that would get our supporters cheering, and with the game in hand, we brought in the second team, and after them, anyone still on the bench.
When we left the gym, we wanted the other team to feel good about having played us. We didn't want their players hanging their heads in embarrassment, especially if we had a game scheduled with them for the following year.
We knew these unspoken rules by 16. How could college players not know as much as we did as teenagers? Maybe it's the times. But I wish that the Grinnell players had had my old coach, who doubled as my math teacher. Coach would have made their ears burn for showing up an opponent as they did.
Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Faith Baptist College team was upset that Taylor was making all of the basketball points. I think that was a good idea that Taylor was making all the points. The Couch of Grinnell should of took Taylor out of the game and put one of the other players in.
ReplyDeleteAshleyotto p2
I agree with Ashley. The coach was at fault too because he just let Taylor keep going. I would be mad and embarrassed too if my team got slaughtered like that. The coach should have done his part and took Taylor out of the game.
ReplyDeleteDavid Hoang p3
I didnt think it was mean or a example of poor sportsmanship being displayed because the other team did score 104 points. If anything I think Jack Taylor looks like a bad teamate. 27 for 71 on three point attempts, what a ball hog. It seems to me that he was very selfish during this game and didnt feel like passing. If I was his coach I would not allow him to be shooting the ball that much, did anyone else even get the ball? If im a scout thats not the type of player I would want on my team.
ReplyDeleteKobe Roth p3
I think it's good sportsmanship to stop trying to score every time possible when your winning by so mych. Rather rude I'd say, Taylor didn't need to show his talent in this game, the other team ovbiously didn't have much so it's honestly not very impressive. Let the players that don't get to play in close games show their talent and potential.
ReplyDeleteCassie P.
Period 3
I agree with everybody, Taylor's coach should have put someone in that may not be receiving as much playing time in the future. I feel like the game became more about Taylor than the team. Also, the other team probably wasn't too excited and gave up. If he was scoring so many points it wasn't unnecessary for him to play as long as he did in order to score that many points.
ReplyDeleteI agree with everybody, Taylor's coach should have put someone in that may not be receiving as much playing time in the future. I feel like the game became more about Taylor than the team. Also, the other team probably wasn't too excited and gave up. If he was scoring so many points it wasn't unnecessary for him to play as long as he did in order to score that many points.
ReplyDeleteI agree with everybody too.I just don't think the other team should put them in the dirt because that is BAD sportsmen ship.If I am on the team that got put down by the other team,I would just quit.That is just stupid that they would do such a thing to the other team like that.It isn't fair but the team that is letting them do that should buck up and not give up like that,they should try to win not try to loose because of the other team putting them down.
ReplyDeletechelsey jensen p7.
172 to 104? I've put in the younger players that doesn't see lot of play time when it was over 125 points. This Taylor kid should've not been in. First off, he could've got hurt. 2nd off, Save him in a big game (close game.) This Coach isn't thinking about ahead. He was just thinking how to kill this one team and I hope next year/game. This other team kills them.
ReplyDeleteRyan Tappe P7
I agree with Tappe.
ReplyDeleteBryanna Bue p7
I agree with Tappe on this one, winning by 75 is rather poor sportsmanship. They just destroyed them and not in a good way. Well it's also not good to destroy them in good way either but that's besides the point. They should of replaced the good players of the other team to switch with the weaker players so the other team can get a chance.
ReplyDeleteP:3
P.Kevin Bouphasavanh
I think that it's good for him to get that many pionts,but i think that either his team isn't that good or he was a ball hog, and didnt want to pass the ball.
ReplyDeleteMatthew Hodek
Per. 3